Archive for August 19th, 2009

Procul Harum Case

The Law Lords were taken back to the halcyon days of their youth recently in passing judgment in the copyright dispute over authorship of the organ solo in Procol Harum’s “A Whiter Shade of Pale”.

In one of the last decisions of the House of Lords before it goes into recess and being replaced by the Supreme court of the UK in October, the Law Lords voted unanimously in favour of Matthew Fisher, the band’s organist that he contributed to the famous, if somewhat lugubrious, organ solo. The ruling now means that Mr Fisher will share in future royalties from the song. According to the Financial Times (31/07/09), the song is one of the most successful songs in British pop history, having sold 6 million copies. However, according to the BBC News website (30/07/09), Mr Fisher claimed that the case was never about money, rather more one of recognition of his input and authorship of the recording.

It is clear from the ruling that the courts will seek to protect composers of musical work, and that the passage of time may not be a barrier to asserting intellectual property rights in a work. On that basis the ruling may open the way for other artistes, who feel that their contribution has been overlooked, to make claims for older works, a move that might not be so welcome by the recording industry.

However, although not expressly addressed in the judgment, it was common ground in the pleadings that the right for damages as a result of copyright infringement expires after six years in England (possibly shorter in Scotland).  To put it another way, Mr Fisher could only claim for back royalties for the period starting six years before he raised proceedings.

What was also revealing about the case was that Baroness Hale commented that she was one of those who remembered the 60′s. Surely the Law Lords must have found some time to enjoy themselves in those care free days…? 

Douglas (although to be honest it was mostly written by my Trainee Martin English)

Recording who you were

Thanks to the wonders of my BT Vision box, I’ve been catching up on some old episodes from the latest series of the BBC’s excellent Who Do You Think You Are?.

The episode featuring Radio 1 DJ, Chris Moyles, was a particularly interesting, if sad, story (described to me by one person as being “irrepressibly grim”). As usual, historic records played a significant role in piecing together the story. However in addition to public records such as census data and entries in the records of births, deaths and marriages, archived records held by private entites also played a part – notably those of the biscuits manufacturer, Jacobs, which showed that one of Chris’ ancestors worked at Jacobs’ factory in Dublin.

This got me wondering whether programmes such as Who Do You Think You Are? would be possible if data protection legislation had been in force one hundred years ago. Would those records have been retained or would they have been destroyed as part of good record-keeping practice once the employee had left and the company no longer had a legitimate need to retain them?

What will happen a hundred years from now when someone wants to research their ancestors? Will they be frustrated by a lack of information, or are we now in such an information-rich society that knowledge of the past will never be lost in the first place? Or will we find that the information that is retained is unreadable because it is in out-dated electronic formats (punch cards, magnetic tape, or even floppy disks) that can no longer be accessed? Bar flood, fire and dustmites, paper (even from the 16th century) will always be eye-readable, but electronic formats may not.

Perhaps this blog entry may be read by one of my descendants looking to find out what I was doing one Sunday afternoon in 2009. Provided, of course, that he or she can find one of those old fashioned computer things to read that antiquated HTML code on.

Martin


Twitter: @BrodiesTechBlog feed

 

August 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 135 other followers