<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sky V. EDS – Misrepresentation Claims Side-Step Classic Breach Of Contract Defences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techblog.brodies.com/2010/01/29/sky-v-eds-%e2%80%93-misrepresentation-claims-side-step-classic-breach-of-contract-defences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techblog.brodies.com/2010/01/29/sky-v-eds-%e2%80%93-misrepresentation-claims-side-step-classic-breach-of-contract-defences/</link>
	<description>Law and Technology by a firm of Lawyers in Scotland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final settlement of Sky v EDS &#8211; £318m to Sky &#171; TechBlog</title>
		<link>http://techblog.brodies.com/2010/01/29/sky-v-eds-%e2%80%93-misrepresentation-claims-side-step-classic-breach-of-contract-defences/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Final settlement of Sky v EDS &#8211; £318m to Sky &#171; TechBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.brodies.com/?p=629#comment-301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] negotiated under the contract (although much less than the £700m that Sky originally sought). As Douglas has previously blogged, that cap didn&#8217;t apply once the court found that one of EDS&#8217; employees had made [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] negotiated under the contract (although much less than the £700m that Sky originally sought). As Douglas has previously blogged, that cap didn&#8217;t apply once the court found that one of EDS&#8217; employees had made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky v. EDS – Follow Up – Interim Damages Award « TechBlog</title>
		<link>http://techblog.brodies.com/2010/01/29/sky-v-eds-%e2%80%93-misrepresentation-claims-side-step-classic-breach-of-contract-defences/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sky v. EDS – Follow Up – Interim Damages Award « TechBlog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.brodies.com/?p=629#comment-198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] February 5, 2010   Uncategorized Leave a&#160;Comment       As a follow up to the blog on Sky v. EDS a few days ago I read that the judge has given Sky interim damages of £200m. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] February 5, 2010   Uncategorized Leave a&nbsp;Comment       As a follow up to the blog on Sky v. EDS a few days ago I read that the judge has given Sky interim damages of £200m. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://techblog.brodies.com/2010/01/29/sky-v-eds-%e2%80%93-misrepresentation-claims-side-step-classic-breach-of-contract-defences/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.brodies.com/?p=629#comment-193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[perhaps more likely to mean more work for in-house lawyers and a further blurring of the lines between the lawyer and the commercial person...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps more likely to mean more work for in-house lawyers and a further blurring of the lines between the lawyer and the commercial person&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

