Archive for the 'Domain Names' Category

Twittersquatting

So, cybersquatters have hit Twitter and Hyundai are considering court action to prevent someone displaying racy pictures and a caption saying, “Have a lustful day” under their name on Twitter. According to this report a number of large brands including Diageo, Burger King, Nike and Volkswagen all have squatters sitting on their accounts.

The UK courts have come down hard on cybersquatters and the Court of Appeal decision in One in a Million virtually outlawed the practice. The One in a Million approach was given express approval by the Court of Session in Scotland in Bonnier Media. In addition, cybersquatters also have to contend with the cheaper and more informal online dispute resolution policies such as the ICANN policy  meaning that a trade mark proprietor or brand owner can generally get their domain name back from a blatant cybersquatter for a few thousand pounds. Obviously there are always grey areas and cybersquatters have become more sophisticated with many seeking smaller sums in order to avoid being seen to be blatantly holding domains to ransom.

So, is there likely to be a lucrative cybersquatting trade in Twitter accounts? In the UK anyway I think this is unlikely. It appears that Twitter are, at present, doing what they can to re-assign well-known brands, even if it does take some time. If this did ever come before the Courts in England or Scotland I’d be very surprised if the approach taken was any different to that taken in One in a Million; that registration of a Twitter account relating to a well-known brand amounted to passing off and, if applicable, trade mark infringement.

In the meantime, no doubt Hyundai will see a significant increase in traffic to their Twitter site.

Iain-Rutherford

Domain names and CPD hours!

Just a quick reminder about our next event in the firm’s autumn seminar series.

Iain Rutherford and Grant Campbell will be talking about domain name disputes next Wednesday, 7 October, from 9 till 10am at our Glasgow offices. The session is a practical look at the rights involved in domain name disputes and the options available for resolving them. It also provides some suggestions on formulating an online brand protection strategy.

This week’s session in Edinburgh brought out some interesting views from our audience on the law’s stance on cyber squatting and in particular the extent to which the law should view it as legitimate entrepeneurship.

For more details and to register, please take this link.

Alternatively, please don’t hesitate to contact one of us if you would prefer.

Eleanor Peterkin

New domain name scam from Asia

Over the last month some of our clients have received  emails relating to domain names from Asia.  The wording varies but the gist of the message is that someone has approached the sender in order to register a domain name which includes our client’s brand, but with the suffix of an Asian territory e.g. .cn, .hk, .tw.

The email then states that the sender has suspended the application in order to allow the recipient (our client) to register the domain name first (usually at quite an expensive price).

Douglas, who’s been in this business longer than me says that this is old domain name scam, but with an Asian flavour.  Previously the emails came from a dodgy company in York, now they come from Asia!

The key point is that there is no third party seeking to register the domain name.  Its just a pressure sales technique to sell over-priced domain registration services.

Normally our advice  is to ignore these emails. if you are scared you will “lose” the relevant domain name then you should register the domain name with your normal supplier (typically your ISP). It will be cheaper.

Remember also that if someone has registered a domain name featuring your brand then you may be able to block that registration using ICANN‘s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution policy.

And, of course, if anyone has any further info on this scam, we’d be happy to hear from you.